Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. RANIversusU.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed, and the petitioner must file a fresh representation before the respondent to address the grievance of lesser payment of retiral dues.

Summary

Smt. Rani filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the payment of her retiral dues by U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd. and other respondents, alleging that the amount paid was less than what she was entitled to. The petitioner sought relief through the writ petition. The Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, held that the petition could not be entertained in its present form. It directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the concerned respondent, setting out her grievance regarding the lesser payment. The Court further ordered that the respondent provide reasons for its decision or cure any defect in the payment expeditiously. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of pending the filing of the fresh representation.

Issues considered

  • What relief, if any, is available to the petitioner regarding the alleged shortfall in retiral dues?

Subjects

  • retirement dues
  • writ petition
  • public sector corporation
  • court direction
  • administrative remedy

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - A No. - 5555 of 2026

                                    Smt. Rani
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd. And 4 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                       :   Pramod K. Gupta
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                       :   Nagesh Kumar

                                    Court No. - 32
                                                HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. Heard Sri P.K. Gupta, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Nagesh
                                    Kumar, Advocate for Respondents.

                                    2. At this stage, the writ petition is disposed of that in case petitioner files
                                    a fresh representation raising his grievance for lesser payment of retiral
                                    dues before concerned respondent, he will provide reason for such
                                    decision or cure defect, if any, expeditiously.



                                                                                 (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    SB




Digitally signed by :-
SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.