Allahabad High Court
FEROZE AHMADversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH CHAIRMAN CORPORATE CENTRE NARIMA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)
- Bench
- SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, and any interim order is vacated.
Summary
Petitioner Feroze Ahmad filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 5661 of 2014) against the State Bank of India before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The petition was listed under the ‘cases shall not be adjourned’ category and was called out in the revised list. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The Court, noting the lack of prosecution, dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been passed was vacated and the matter was consigned to the records.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non‑appearance of the petitioner?
- Whether the interim order, if any, should be vacated upon dismissal of the petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
- procedural default
- high court
Judgment
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:34288
Court No. - 20
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5661 of 2014
Petitioner :- Feroze Ahmad
Respondent :- State Bank Of India Through Chairman
Corporate Centre Narima
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishwa Prakash,Afaq Zaki Khan
Counsel for Respondent :- Anurag Srivastava
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
1. Case is listed under 'the cases shall not be adjourned
category.'
2. Case called out in revised list. None is present for the
petitioner to press this petition.
3. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed
for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. Consigned to records.
Order Date :- 2.5.2024
Mayank
Digitally signed by :-
MAYANK PRATAP SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…