Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DR. FARHAT BANOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court held that the petition for consideration of the pension representation (prayer‑2) is maintainable and disposed of the writ petition, directing a fresh representation to be filed.

Summary

The petitioner, Dr. Farhat Bano, filed a writ petition seeking two reliefs, but later instructed counsel to pursue only the second prayer, which sought consideration of a representation for fixation of pension in accordance with law. The High Court examined the petition and determined that the second prayer was maintainable. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition, directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation containing all relevant facts and documents before the concerned respondent. The court ordered that the respondent consider the fresh representation expeditiously, within eight weeks. No substantive merits of the pension claim were adjudicated, as the petition was dismissed pending a fresh application.

Issues considered

  • Whether the representation for fixation of pension can be considered by the respondent
  • Whether the writ petition can be disposed when the petitioner withdraws one of the prayers

Subjects

  • pension
  • representation
  • writ petition
  • high court
  • administrative law

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - A No. - 5846 of 2026

                                    Dr. Farhat Bano
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)               :   Rizwan Ahmad(Qureshi)
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)               :   C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 32
                                                HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. At the outset, Sri Rizwan Ahmad (Qureshi), learned counsel for
                                    petitioner, on instructions, submits that petitioner is not pressing prayer -
                                    1 and is pressing only prayer - 2 that a representation for fixation of
                                    pension be considered in accordance with law.

                                    2. Court finds that prayer-2 can be considered. Accordingly, this writ
                                    petition is disposed of with an observation that in case petitioner moves a
                                    fresh representation mentioning all relevant facts and documents before
                                    concerned respondent, concerned respondent will consider the same
                                    expeditiously, within eight weeks.



                                                                                (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    N. Sinha




Digitally signed by :-
NIRMAL SINHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.