Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

LUCKNOW DIOCESAN TRUST ASSOCIATION PROPERTY TRUSTversusANIL GOEL AND 2 OTHERS

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 6062 of 2016) was filed by Lucknow Diocesan Trust Association Property Trust against Anil Goel and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Rajesh Mishra, did not appear before the court. The respondents, represented by Madan Mohan Chaurasisa and Vinayak Mithal, were present. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution, stating that there was no appearance to press the petition. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted was vacated.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - A No. - 6062 of 2016


                                    Lucknow Diocesan Trust Association Property
                                    Trust                                                        .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                           Versus

                                    Anil Goel And 2 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Rajesh Mishra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : , Madan Mohan Chaurasisa, Vinayak
                                                                       Mithal

                                    Court No. - 35
                                            HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

                                    Case called out in the revised list.

                                    None appears for the petitioner to press the petition.

                                    Sri Birendra Kumar, holding brief of Sri Vinayak Mithal, learned counsel
                                    for the respondents is present.

                                    Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    Interim order, if any, stands vacated.


                                                                             (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
                                    April 22, 2026
                                    RKK/-




Digitally signed by :-
RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.