Allahabad High Court
SMT DARAKHSHAN BILGRAMIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
A proper application for voluntary retirement, filed in the prescribed format with requisite documents, must be considered by the respondent in accordance with the applicable rules.
Summary
The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher, filed a writ petition seeking voluntary retirement from service under the Uttar Pradesh State Aided Higher Secondary School Teachers Death and Retirement Gratuity Rules, 1981. The petitioner submitted an application dated 26‑11‑2025 for voluntary retirement and requested that it be processed strictly according to law. The respondent’s standing counsel indicated that a proper application, if filed, would be considered in accordance with the applicable rules. The High Court, without examining the merits, directed the petitioner to file a complete application with all required documents in the prescribed format within three weeks. The court further ordered that the respondent consider the application per law and inform the petitioner of any legal impediment. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed with the said direction.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is eligible to retire voluntarily under the Uttar Pradesh State Aided Higher Secondary School Teachers Death and Retirement Gratuity Rules, 1981
- Whether the petitioner’s application complies with the procedural requirements prescribed by law
Legislation cited
- Uttar Pradesh State Aided Higher Secondary School Teachers Death and Retirement Gratuity Rules, 1981
Subjects
- voluntary retirement
- service law
- writ petition
- administrative law
- education sector
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 6156 of 2026
Smt Darakhshan Bilgrami
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Siddharth Khare
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 32
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Heard Sri Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri
D.P.Singh, learned Standing Counsel.
2. Petitioner does not work more on the post of Assistant Teacher and has
applied for Voluntarily Retirement from Service by way of application dated
26.11.2025.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner refers Uttar Pradesh State Aided Higher
Secondary School Teachers Death and Retirement Gratuity Rules, 1981,
where there is a reference of Voluntarily Retirement from Service and
further prayers that his application be considered strictly in accordance with
law.
4. Learned Standing Counsel on basis of limited instructions submits that in
case proper application for Voluntarily Retirement from Service is filed by
the petitioner, same will be considered strictly in accordance with law.
5. In the aforesaid circumstances without entering into the merits of the case,
this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that application so filed
by the petitioner be filed with all relevant documents in a proper format
within a period of 3 weeks from today, same will be considered by concern
respondent in accordance with law and in case of any legal impediment,
same be informed to the petitioner.
(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
May 6, 2026
SB
Digitally signed by :-
SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…