Allahabad High Court
RAMA RANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The Court disposed of the writ petition as the petitioner's grievance for promotion had already been addressed.
Summary
The petitioner, Rama Rani, filed a writ petition seeking promotion. During the pendency of the petition, the grievance regarding the promotion was resolved by the authorities. The petitioner's counsel requested that the writ petition be disposed of on this ground. The State's standing counsel had no objection to the request. The Court, noting that the relief sought had already been granted, disposed of the writ petition without further hearing.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition seeking promotion should continue when the grievance has been addressed during its pendency
Subjects
- promotion
- writ petition
- disposal
- administrative law
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 6183 of 2026
Rama Rani
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hira Lal Singh(Kushwaha), Prem
Narayan Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 32
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Sri H.L. Singh Kushwaha, learned counsel for petitioner, submits that
during pendency of this writ petition grievance of petitioner for promotion
has already been addressed, therefore, this writ petition may be disposed
of.
2. Ms. Tanu Roopanwal, learned Standing Counsel appearing for State-
Respondents, has no objection to aforesaid prayer.
3. Considering above subsequent events, this writ petition is disposed of.
(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
May 6, 2026
AK
Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…