Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AMANversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petitioner is eligible for a compassionate appointment, but his appointment will occur only after those ahead of him in the list are appointed, and the list itself is not subject to challenge.

Summary

The petitioner, Aman, filed a writ petition seeking a compassionate appointment as Multi Tasking Staff. The court found that he is eligible for such an appointment and is placed at serial number 69 in the relevant list, which has moved to serial number 66 as of 23‑04‑2026. The court noted that his appointment will be considered only after all persons ahead of him in the list are appointed on a compassionate basis. The petition did not challenge the validity of the list. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without granting any relief.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is eligible for a compassionate appointment as Multi Tasking Staff
  • Whether the list of eligible candidates can be challenged in the writ petition

Subjects

  • compassionate appointment
  • Multi Tasking Staff
  • writ petition
  • eligibility
  • appointment list

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - A No. - 6217 of 2026

                                    Aman
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    Union Of India And 4 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Anil Kumar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : A.S.G.I., Abrar       Ahmad,     Shashank
                                                                       Shekhar Singh

                                    Court No. - 32
                                               HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. Heard Sri A.K. Upadhyay, Advocate holding brief of Sri Anil Kumar

                                    Shukla, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Abrar Ahmad, Advocate for

                                    Respondent-1 and Sri Shashank Shekhar Singh, Advocate for

                                    Respondents-2 to 5.

                                    2. It is not under much dispute that petitioner is found eligible for

                                    compassionate appointment as Multi Tasking Staff and he was at Serial

                                    No. 69 in the list (currently at Serial No. 66 as on 23.04.2026) and,

                                    therefore, his claim will be considered as soon as persons ahead of him

                                    are appointed on compassionate basis.


                                    3. It is necessary to observe here that aforesaid list is not under challenge.


                                    4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.


                                                                                 (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    AK




Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.