Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

BHARTENDU SINGH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of, with the petitioners directed to file an independent representation for the gratuity claim.

Summary

The petitioners, Bhartendu Singh and five others, filed a writ petition seeking the benefit of gratuity from the State of Uttar Pradesh. Their counsel, Gautam Baghel, submitted the petition along with supporting documents. The court examined the petition and observed that the petitioners need to file an independent representation containing the factual and legal averments. The court disposed of the writ petition, directing the petitioners to approach the respondent with a proper representation, after which the respondent will pass an order in accordance with law. No substantive adjudication on the gratuity claim was made.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate forum for the petitioners to claim gratuity benefits?
  • Whether the writ petition is maintainable for seeking gratuity relief?

Subjects

  • gratuity
  • service benefits
  • writ petition
  • labour law
  • administrative law

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - A No. - 6343 of 2026

                                    Bhartendu Singh And 5 Others
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                      :      Gautam Baghel
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                      :      C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 32
                                               HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. Heard Sri Gautam Baghel, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri

                                    Vinod Kumar Rai, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents.


                                    2. Petitioners are claiming benefit of gratuity and for that learned counsel

                                    for petitioners refers the averments made in this writ petition as well as

                                    documents annexed and prays that petitioners’ respective representation

                                    be decided by concerned respondent.


                                    3. In aforesaid circumstances, on basis of above submission, this writ

                                    petition is disposed of with an observation that in case petitioners file

                                    independent representation mentioning necessary averments on fact as

                                    well as on law, concerned respondent will pass independent order in

                                    accordance with law.


                                                                               (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    AK




Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.