Allahabad High Court
PROF DR INDU SHARMAversusMAHATMA JYOTIBA PHULE MJP ROHILKHAND UNIVERSITY BAREILLY AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is disposed of as the petitioner’s grievance has been substantially addressed.
Summary
Petitioner Prof Dr Indu Sharma filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner’s grievance was substantially addressed. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be disposed of on this basis. The respondents’ counsel concurred that the grievance had been resolved. The Court, after considering the submissions of both parties, disposed of the writ petition.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should continue when the petitioner’s grievance has been substantially addressed
Subjects
- writ petition
- disposal
- withdrawal
- grievance resolved
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 6374 of 2026
Prof Dr Indu Sharma
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Mjp Rohilkhand University
Bareilly And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vashishtha Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rohit Pandey
Court No. - 32
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Heard Sri Vashishtha Tiwari, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri
Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents and Sri
Rohit Pandey, Advocate for Respondents-1 and 2.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner, on instruction, submits that during
pendency of this writ petition petitioner’s grievance has already been
substantially addressed, therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of.
3. Learned counsel for respondents have acknowledged the aforesaid fact.
4. Considering above submissions and subsequent event, this writ petition
is disposed of.
(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
May 7, 2026
AK
Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…