Allahabad High Court
SANTOSH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars upon payment of the prescribed cost.
Summary
Petitioners Santosh Kumar and two others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was challenged on the ground that it lacked sufficient particulars. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The Court, after considering the submission, disposed of the writ petition, granting liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court imposed a cost of Rs.100 to be deposited in the High Court Bar Association account, and directed that a fresh petition will be entertained only after receipt of the cost.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition filed by the petitioners is maintainable in its present form due to lack of adequate particulars
Subjects
- writ petition
- procedural deficiency
- cost
- fresh petition
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 6624 of 2026
Santosh Kumar And 2 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Saeed Siddiqui
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 32
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Sri Mohd. Saeed Siddiqui, learned counsel for petitioners, at the outset,
submits that the writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to
petitioners to file a fresh with better particulars.
2. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty, as prayed for
with cost of Rs. 100/- to be deposited in the Bank account of High Court
Bar Association, Allahabad.
3. Registry will accept fresh petition only after receipt of payment of cost.
(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
May 5, 2026
AK
Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…