Allahabad High Court
BHIM SENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR
- Decided
- Bench
- MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Bhim Sen filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 67251 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the parties, though the State's standing counsel was present. The Court noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition when there is no prosecution?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- civil procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 67251 of 2014
Bhim Sen
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And Anr
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajeet Kumar, Mahendra Kumar Yadav,
Sudarshan Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ram Chandra Singh Yadav
Court No. - 52
HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
1. List is revised. None appears on behalf of the parties.
2. Learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
3. The matter is of the year 2014.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.)
May 7, 2026
K.N.
Digitally signed by :-
KALP NATH SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…