Allahabad High Court
RAHULversusMANJU GARG
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution and the interim order is vacated.
Summary
Rahul filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 6736 of 2020) against Manju Garg in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioner and the petition was not prosecuted. The Court found no basis to proceed and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been passed was vacated. The judgment was delivered by Justice Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava on 22 April 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petition is not prosecuted?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal for want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
- procedural default
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 6736 of 2020
Rahul
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Manju Garg
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Srivastava, Pratik J. Nagar
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Prem Chand Jain
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None appears for the petitioner to press the petition.
Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
April 22, 2026
RKK/-
Digitally signed by :-
RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…