Allahabad High Court
SMT. REKHA RANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Holding
The writ petition is premature and is dismissed.
Summary
The petitioner, Smt. Rekha Rani, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The respondents, through their counsel, objected that the petition was premature and not maintainable. The petitioner’s counsel sought a stay on the objection and requested the petition to be entertained. The Court examined the objection and found that the petition was indeed premature. Consequently, the Court ordered that the writ petition should not be pressed and dismissed it.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition filed by the petitioner is premature and therefore non‑maintainable.
Subjects
- writ petition
- prematurity
- maintainability
- High Court
- civil procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 6769 of 2026
Smt. Rekha Rani
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajnish Kumar Srivastava, Siddharth
Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Gaurav Bishan, Raghuvansh Misra
Court No. - 52
HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
Upon an objection raised by learned Standing Counsel for the State, Mr.
Gaurav Bishan, learned counsel for respondent nos. 3 & 4, and Mr. Shivank,
holding brief for Mr. Raghuvansh Misra, learned counsel for respondent no.
5, that the writ petition is premature, learned counsel for the petitioner prays
to not-press the writ petition.
Accordingly ordered.
May 6, 2026
DS
(Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
DIGAMBER SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…