Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ANIL KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of, with the court directing that the petitioner may seek his salary arrears through a fresh representation to be decided within eight weeks.

Summary

The petitioner, Anil Kumar Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking payment of arrears of salary from the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioner alleged that his salary dues had not been paid despite his entitlement. The respondents did not contest the claim but the court noted that the grievance should be raised through a fresh representation, if any, before the appropriate authority. The court directed that any such representation be considered expeditiously and the matter be resolved within eight weeks from the date of the order. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of with the observation that the petitioner may pursue his claim through the prescribed administrative process.

Issues considered

  • What relief, if any, is available to the petitioner for alleged arrears of salary under the writ petition?

Subjects

  • salary arrears
  • writ petition
  • service matters
  • administrative law
  • fresh representation

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - A No. - 6792 of 2026

                                    Anil Kumar Sharma
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)      : Aditendra       Singh,     Sachchidanand
                                                                     Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)      : C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 32
                                                HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. Heard Sri Aditendra Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and learned
                                    Standing Counsel for State.

                                    2. At this stage, Court finds that present writ petition can be disposed of
                                    with an observation that grievance of petitioner for arrears of salary can
                                    be considered on basis of a fresh representation, if any filed and
                                    thereafter, concerned respondent will consider the same expeditiously in
                                    accordance with law within eight weeks from today.

                                    3. Writ petition stands disposed of with above observations.




                                                                               (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    N. Sinha




Digitally signed by :-
NIRMAL SINHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.