Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

PREM PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as the petitioner can seek satisfaction of the award through the Labour Court under the Industrial Disputes Act.

Summary

The petitioner, Prem Pal Singh, filed a writ petition challenging the non‑payment of an amount awarded by the Labour Court on 24 April 2022 in Adjudication Case No. 184 of 2007. The High Court examined whether it could intervene to enforce the award. The Court observed that the petitioner has an alternative remedy by approaching the Labour Court under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act for satisfaction of the award. Consequently, the Court found no basis to entertain the writ petition. The petition was therefore disposed without any order directing payment.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can entertain a writ petition for enforcement of a Labour Court award when an alternative remedy exists under the Industrial Disputes Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • labour court award
  • Industrial Disputes Act
  • enforcement
  • alternative remedy
  • High Court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - A No. - 6797 of 2026

                                    Prem Pal Singh
                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)           :   Awadhesh Prasad, Balbir Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)           :   Anadi Krishna Narayana, C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 33
                                                        HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anadi Krishna
                                    Narayana, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3.

                                    2. There is a dispute pertaining to the payment of awarded amount in
                                    pursuance of the award dated 24.4.2022 passed by Labour Court in
                                    Adjudication Case No. 184 of 2007, Prem Pal Singh vs. M/s Assistant
                                    Regional Manager and others.

                                    3. In my opinion, the petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach the
                                    Labour court with respect to his grievance, if any, concerning satisfaction
                                    of the awarded amount under the relevant provisions of the Industrial
                                    Dispute Act.

                                    4. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of.



                                                                                           (Dinesh Pathak,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    Sushma




Digitally signed by :-
SUSHAMA YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.