Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAVINDRA BHATTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed, with the Court directing that any claim for salary arrears must be pursued through a fresh representation to be decided within eight weeks.

Summary

Petitioner Ravindra Bhatt filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking payment of arrears of salary from the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioner alleged that his salary dues had not been paid and sought relief through the writ. The Court observed that the grievance could be addressed only if the petitioner files a fresh representation before the concerned authority. It directed the respondents to consider any such fresh representation expeditiously and decide within eight weeks from the date of the order. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of without granting any monetary relief.

Issues considered

  • What relief, if any, is available to the petitioner for alleged arrears of salary under the writ petition?

Subjects

  • salary arrears
  • service law
  • writ petition
  • administrative law
  • fresh representation
  • High Court

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - A No. - 6801 of 2026

                                    Ravindra Bhatt
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)      : Aditendra       Singh,     Sachchidanand
                                                                     Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)      : C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 32
                                                HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. Heard Sri Aditendra Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and learned
                                    Standing Counsel for State.

                                    2. At this stage, Court finds that present writ petition can be disposed of
                                    with an observation that grievance of petitioner for arrears of salary can
                                    be considered on basis of a fresh representation, if any filed and
                                    thereafter, concerned respondent will consider the same expeditiously in
                                    accordance with law within eight weeks from today.

                                    3. Writ petition stands disposed of with above observations.



                                                                               (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    N. Sinha




Digitally signed by :-
NIRMAL SINHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.