Allahabad High Court
RAJPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed, leaving the earlier judgment on the period of communication undisturbed.
Summary
Petitioner Rajpal Singh filed a writ petition challenging a prior judgment of this Court in Radheshyam Shukla v. State of U.P. concerning the period of communication prescribed therein. The petitioner sought relief on the ground that the earlier decision was erroneous. The Court examined the prayer and found no merit to overturn the earlier ruling. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed. The Court further directed that the petitioner may approach the appropriate respondent for any other grievance not covered by this petition.
Issues considered
- Whether the period of communication stipulated in the earlier judgment (Radheshyam Shukla v. State of U.P.) is legally valid and can be challenged by the petitioner
Subjects
- writ petition
- period of communication
- dismissal
- High Court of Allahabad
- procedural law
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 6871 of 2026
Rajpal Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Prasad Kanaujiya
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 32
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Heard Sri Ram Prakash Kanaujiya, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri
Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents.
2. The prayer of petitioner is against the judgment passed by this Court in
Radheshyam Shukla and others vs. State of U.P. and others,
2025:AHC:32012, so far as period of communication is concerned.
3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
4. So far as any other grievance is concerned, petitioner is at liberty to approach
the concerned respondent.
(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
May 7, 2026
AK
Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…