Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ISHRAQ ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.SECONDARY EDU.LUCKNOW and ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Ishraq Ali filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The State's counsel was present and argued the petition. The Court held that a writ petition cannot proceed without prosecution and therefore dismissed it for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order previously granted was vacated and the matter was consigned to the records.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear or prosecute a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • want of prosecution
  • procedural dismissal
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             LUCKNOW
                                                               WRIT - A No. - 7362 of 2018

                                     Ishraq Ali
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                     State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Secondary
                                     Edu.Lucknow And Ors.                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Petitioner(s)                  :   Nagendra Bahadur Singh
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)                  :   C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 18
                                                     HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case called out.

                                    2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the State is present.

                                    4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. Consigned to records.



                                                                                          (Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
                                    November 13, 2025
                                    AKS




Digitally signed by :-
ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.