Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ATUL KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.

Summary

The petitioner, Atul Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 7445 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and six other respondents. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Satendra Tripathi, requested that the petition be disposed of with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The counsel for the contesting respondents, R.C. Dwivedi, raised no objection to this request. The Court, after considering the submissions, granted the petitioner's request and ordered the disposal of the writ petition, permitting the petitioner to file a fresh petition. No substantive merits of the original petition were addressed, and the matter was concluded procedurally.

Issues considered

  • What procedural basis allows a writ petition to be disposed of with liberty to file a fresh petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • procedural law
  • petition dismissal
  • fresh petition
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                              WRIT - A No. - 7445 of 2026

                                    Atul Kumar Singh
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 6 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)              :   Jyoti Singh, Satendra Tirpathi
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)              :   C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 32
                                                 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. Sri Satendra Tripathi, learned counsel for petitioner, after arguing for

                                    some time, submits that the writ petition may be disposed of with liberty

                                    to file a fresh with better particulars.


                                    2. Sri R.C. Dwivedi, Advocate for contesting-respondents has no

                                    objection.


                                    3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty, as prayed for.


                                                                                  (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    May 18, 2026
                                    AK




Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.