Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHARDENDU SHUKLAversusKING GEORGE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY LUCKNOW THROUGH REGISTRAR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off/Decided on merits

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Shardendu Shukla filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 7463 of 2004) against King George Medical University, Lucknow. The petition was listed as an oldest case but the petitioner failed to appear even after a revised call. The respondent’s counsel and the Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State were present. The Court observed that the petitioner had not prosecuted the petition and therefore dismissed it for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim relief previously granted was discharged.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • civil procedure
  • High Court
  • Allahabad

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             LUCKNOW
                                                             WRIT - A No. - 7463 of 2004

                                     Shardendu Shukla
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                     King George Medical University Lucknow
                                     Through Registrar                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Shiv P Shukla, Krishna Mohan
                                                                       Srivastava
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)       : I.B.Singh, Dev Prakash Mishra,
                                                                       Krishna Chandra, Mr. Sidharth Dhaon

                                    Court No. - 30
                                                      HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.

                                    1. This matter is listed in the category of oldest cases.

                                    2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner even in revised call.

                                    3. Sri Badrish Tripathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the
                                    State-respondents is present.

                                    4. Accordingly, this matter is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands discharged.



                                                                                            (Indrajeet Shukla,J.)
                                    December 8, 2025
                                    S.P.




Digitally signed by :-
SANJAY PURI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.