Allahabad High Court
MRS. VARUNAversusSTATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECY.BASIC EDUCATION LKO.AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed on merits/Rejected
- Bench
- PANKAJ BHATIA
Holding
A writ petition must be actively prosecuted; in the absence of the petitioner, it is liable to be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Mrs. Varuna filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The court observed that the petition could not be prosecuted in the absence of the petitioner. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order that had been granted earlier was vacated. The matter was consigned to the records.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear before the court?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- procedural law
- interim order
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 7850 of 2018
Mrs. Varuna
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P.Through Secy.Basic Education
Lko.And Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Madhusudan Srivastava, Satya Pal,
Vipin Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar
Court No. - 18
HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records.
(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
November 14, 2025
Anurag
Digitally signed by :-
ANURAG SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…