Allahabad High Court
MANOJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Manoj Kumar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, while the State respondents were represented. The court noted the absence of any prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The dismissal was recorded on 23 April 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear or prosecute a writ petition before the High Court?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- procedural law
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 8593 of 2025
Manoj Kumar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kumar Ashutosh Srivastava, Nagendra
Pratap Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Jai Prakash Gupta
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition.
Sri Vidya Kant Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for the State
respondents is present.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
April 23, 2026
Neetu
Digitally signed by :-
NEETU SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…