Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AMRENDRA PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDUCATION AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear and pursue the writ.

Summary

The petitioner, Amrendra Pratap Singh, filed Writ‑A No. 915 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. No representative of the petitioner appeared before the Court to press the petition. The State, represented by counsel, was present. The Court observed that the petition could not proceed in the absence of the petitioner and dismissed it for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that may have been in force was vacated and the matter was consigned to the records.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear before the Court?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • procedural law
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             LUCKNOW
                                                               WRIT - A No. - 915 of 2019

                                     Amrendra Pratap Singh
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                     State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Education And
                                     Ors.                                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Sushil Kumar Pathak, Rakesh Kumar
                                                                        Singh
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)        : C.S.C., J.B.S.Rathor

                                    Court No. - 18
                                                     HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case called out.

                                    2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the State is present.

                                    4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. Consigned to records.



                                                                                          (Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
                                    January 5, 2026
                                    AKS




Digitally signed by :-
ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.