Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

BRIJESH KHANDURIversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FOREST DEPTT. LKO and ANOTHER

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off/Decided on merits

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Petitioner Brijesh Khanduri filed Writ Petition No. 9411 of 2020 before the Allahabad High Court challenging orders of the State of Uttar Pradesh, Forest Department. No petitioner appeared before the Court to pursue the petition. The State's counsel was present and argued the petition was pending. The Court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution, noting the petitioner’s failure to appear. Consequently, any interim relief previously granted was vacated and the matter was consigned to the records.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear and prosecute a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             LUCKNOW
                                                               WRIT - A No. - 9411 of 2020

                                     Brijesh Khanduri
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                     State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko
                                     And Another                                                   .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Vibhanshu Srivastava
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)        : C.S.C., Krishana Kumar Singh, Satish
                                                                        Singh

                                    Court No. - 18
                                                     HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case called out.

                                    2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the State is present.

                                    4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. Consigned to records.



                                                                                          (Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
                                    December 18, 2025
                                    Mayank




Digitally signed by :-
MAYANK PRATAP SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.