Allahabad High Court
VIVEK KUMARversusFOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA THRU. M.D. KHADYA SADAN and ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed on merits/Rejected
- Bench
- PANKAJ BHATIA
Holding
The petition was dismissed because the petitioner failed to prosecute the writ.
Summary
Vivek Kumar filed a writ petition against the Food Corporation of India. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition. Counsel for the State was present, but the petitioner’s counsel was absent. The court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted was vacated and the matter was consigned to the records.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal for want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 9529 of 2018
Vivek Kumar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Food Corporation Of India Thru. M.D. Khadya
Sadan And Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Dhaon, Mr. Sidharth Dhaon
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anurag Verma, Shikhar Anand
Court No. - 18
HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records.
(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
December 11, 2025
Mayank
Digitally signed by :-
MAYANK PRATAP SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…