Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAM LAKHAN AND OTHERSversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners failed to appear before the High Court to prosecute their writ petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of Rs. 1,000 to be deposited in the High Court Legal Services Committee account. The Court directed that the petition may be restored only upon filing an application accompanied by proof of payment of the cost. A copy of the order was to be sent to the petitioners at the address on record. The Registrar was instructed to take necessary steps for compliance.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • cost
  • restoration

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - B No. - 11691 of 1983

                                    Ram Lakhan And Others
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    D.D.C. And Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                       :    V.D. Ojha
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                       :    S.C., V.B. Khare

                                    Court No. - 32
                                                HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. None appeared on behalf of petitioners to press this writ petition.

                                    2. Dismissed for want of prosecution with cost of Rs. 1000/- to be deposited
                                    in the Bank account of High Court Legal Services Committee.

                                    3. Registry would accept any application for restoration, if filed, only with
                                    proof of payment of cost.

                                    4. A copy of this order be sent to petitioner on the given address.

                                    5. Registrar (Compliance) to take steps.


                                                                                 (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    January 28, 2026
                                    AK




Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.