Allahabad High Court
CHANDRAPAL AND ANNOTHERversusD.D.C.AND OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the High Court of Allahabad but no counsel appeared on their behalf to prosecute the case. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered the petitioners to pay a cost of Rs. 1000 to the High Court Legal Services Committee. The order provides that the petitioners may apply for restoration of the petition upon proof of payment of the cost. A copy of the order is to be sent to the petitioners at the address on record. The registrar is directed to take necessary steps to enforce the order.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- cost
- restoration
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - B No. - 11795 of 1983
Chandrapal And Annother
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
D.D.C.And Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S.P.S. Baghel, Vasudeo Shukla
Counsel for Respondent(s) : S.C., S.D.N. Singh
Court No. - 32
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. None appeared on behalf of petitioners to press this writ petition.
2. Dismissed for want of prosecution with cost of Rs. 1000/- to be deposited
in the Bank account of High Court Legal Services Committee.
3. Registry would accept any application for restoration, if filed, only with
proof of payment of cost.
4. A copy of this order be sent to petitioner on the given address.
5. Registrar (Compliance) to take steps.
(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
January 28, 2026
AK
Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…