Allahabad High Court
RAM NARESHversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
A writ petition was filed by Ram Naresh seeking relief against the respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The High Court, noting the lack of prosecution, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of Rs. 1000 to be deposited in the High Court Legal Services Committee account. The order further directed that any application for restoration of the petition would be entertained only upon proof of payment of the cost. A copy of the order was to be sent to the petitioner’s address and the Registrar (Compliance) was instructed to take necessary steps.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- cost
- restoration
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - B No. - 12164 of 1981
Ram Naresh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
D.D.C. And Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh K. Dwivedi, H.S.N. Tripathi,
Rajiv Mishra
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Gauri Shanker Mishra, Rama Shankar
Mishra, S K Pandey
Court No. - 32
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. None appeared on behalf of petitioner to press this writ petition.
2. Dismissed for want of prosecution with cost of Rs. 1000/- to be deposited
in the Bank account of High Court Legal Services Committee.
3. Registry would accept any application for restoration, if filed, only with
proof of payment of cost.
4. A copy of this order be sent to petitioner on the given address.
5. Registrar (Compliance) to take steps.
(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
January 28, 2026
AK
Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…