Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

JAMILversusD.D.C AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution, and the interim order was vacated.

Summary

A writ petition (Writ B No. 14069 of 1982) was listed for priority hearing before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared before the court, and only counsel for the private respondents and the State respondents were present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner and, after hearing the respondents' counsel, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, the interim order dated 26 April 1983 was vacated. The dismissal reflects the court's procedural stance that a petition cannot proceed without the petitioner’s presence or active prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's absence

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • interim order
  • procedural law
  • want of prosecution

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                                WRIT - B No. - 14069 of 1982

                                    Jamil
                                                                                                             .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                              Versus
                                    D.D.C And Others
                                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             :   G.C. Saxena, H.N. Sharma, Mohd. Arif,
                                                                              Mohd.Arif, Tabish Mohd.
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             :   A.M.Zaidi, R.A.Yadav, Rizwan Ahmad, S.
                                                                              Wajid Ali, S.C., S.K. Pundir, Sanjay Kumar
                                                                              Pundir, Syed Wajid Ali

                                    Court No. - 54
                                                          HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.

                                    1. Cases listed under heading of "oldest pending cases for priority hearing" are being
                                    revised.

                                    2. No one is present to press this writ petition.

                                    3. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pundir learned Counsel is present for private respondents.

                                    4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents is also present.

                                    5.The instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    6. Interim order dated 26.4.1983 stands vacated.

                                    April 23, 2026
                                    PS*
                                                                                                 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
PRITI SHARMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.