Allahabad High Court
CHANDRA AND ANOTHERversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners, Chandra and another, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or engage counsel. The court noted that a notice dated 17 March 2026 was duly served on the petitioners to appoint new counsel. Since no representation was made, the petition could not be prosecuted. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Any interim relief previously granted was vacated. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.
Subjects
- procedural law
- writ petition
- dismissal for want of prosecution
- service of notice
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - B No. - 14114 of 1983
Chandra And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
D.D.C. And Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : L.S.Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s) : S.C.
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition.
Office report dated 17.3.2026 indicates sufficiency of service of notice
issued to the petitioners to engage another counsel.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
March 18, 2026
Arun K. Singh
Digitally signed by :-
ARUN KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…