Allahabad High Court
GHINAHU AND OTHERSversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ‑B No. 14665 of 1982) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered a cost of Rs. 1000 to be deposited with the High Court Legal Services Committee. The Registry was directed to accept any application for restoration only upon proof of payment of the cost. Any interim order previously granted was vacated. A copy of the order was to be sent to the petitioners.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- cost
- restoration
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - B No. - 14665 of 1982
Ghinahu And Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
D.D.C. And Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : R.K. Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s) : R.N. Singh
Court No. - 32
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. None appeared on behalf of petitioners to press this writ petition.
2. Dismissed for want of prosecution with cost of Rs. 1000/- to be
deposited in the Bank account of High Court Legal Services Committee.
3. Registry would accept any application for restoration, if filed, only
with proof of payment of cost.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. A copy of this order be sent to petitioners on given address.
6. Registrar (Compliance) to take steps.
(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
April 20, 2026
AK
Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…