Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAM LALversusB.O.R.

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Ram Lal, filed Writ Petition No. 147 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner to press the petition. The court noted that an office report dated 17‑04‑2026 confirmed that notice served on the petitioner to engage another counsel was sufficient. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non‑appearance of the petitioner

Subjects

  • civil procedure
  • writ petition
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                              WRIT - B No. - 147 of 1981

                                    Ram Lal
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                           Versus

                                    B.O.R.
                                                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                                :      R.N.Rai
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                                :      S.C.

                                    Court No. - 35
                                             HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

                                    Case called out in the revised list.

                                    None appears for the petitioner to press the petition.

                                    Office report dated 17.4.2026 indicates sufficiency of service of notice
                                    issued to the petitioner to engage anther counsel.

                                    Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    Interim order, if any, stands vacated.


                                                                             (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    RKK/-




Digitally signed by :-
RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.