Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

HORI LAL AND OTHERSversusD.D.C.AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Hori Lal and others filed Writ Petition No. 15062 of 1983 against D.D.C. and others. The petitioners failed to appear before the court despite being served notice, as confirmed by an office report dated 17‑April‑2026 indicating sufficient service. No counsel was engaged by the petitioners. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in force.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners were duly served notice to appear and engage counsel
  • Whether dismissal for want of prosecution is appropriate in the absence of the petitioners

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • service of notice
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - B No. - 15062 of 1983

                                    Hori Lal And Others
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                           Versus

                                    D.D.C.And Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                               :   S. Rai
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                               :   S.K. Singh

                                    Court No. - 35
                                            HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

                                    Case called out in the revised list.

                                    None appears for the petitioners to press the petition.

                                    Office report dated 17.4.2026 indicates sufficiency of service of notice
                                    issued to the petitioners to engage anther counsel.

                                    Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    Interim order, if any, stands vacated.


                                                                             (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    RKK/-




Digitally signed by :-
RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.