Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. SHANTI DEVIversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Shanti Devi, filed a writ petition (Writ B No. 15128 of 1981) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of Rs. 1000 to be deposited with the High Court Legal Services Committee. The Registry was directed to accept any application for restoration only upon proof of payment of the cost. Any interim order, if previously granted, was vacated. A copy of the order was to be sent to the petitioner’s address.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • cost
  • restoration

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - B No. - 15128 of 1981

                                    Smt. Shanti Devi
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    D.D.C. And Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                   :   A.Hajela
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                   :   Shiv Shankar Pandey

                                    Court No. - 32
                                               HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. None appeared on behalf of petitioner to press this writ petition.


                                    2. Dismissed for want of prosecution with cost of Rs. 1000/- to be

                                    deposited in the Bank account of High Court Legal Services Committee.


                                    3. Registry would accept any application for restoration, if filed, only

                                    with proof of payment of cost.


                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.


                                    5. A copy of this order be sent to petitioner on given address.


                                    6. Registrar (Compliance) to take steps.


                                                                                (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    AK




Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.