Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

LALLAN AND OTHERSversusD.D.C.AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

A writ petition (Writ‑B No. 15936 of 1983) was filed by Lallan and others against D.D.C. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of Rs. 1000 to be deposited in the High Court Legal Services Committee account. The Registry was directed to accept any application for restoration of the petition, provided proof of payment of the cost is furnished. The interim order, if any, was vacated and a copy of the order was to be sent to the petitioners.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • cost order
  • restoration
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - B No. - 15936 of 1983

                                    Lallan And Others
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    D.D.C.And Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                              :   R.N. Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                              :   S.C.

                                    Court No. - 32
                                               HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. None appeared on behalf of petitioners to press this writ petition.


                                    2. Dismissed for want of prosecution with cost of Rs. 1000/- to be

                                    deposited in the Bank account of High Court Legal Services Committee.


                                    3. Registry would accept any application for restoration, if filed, only

                                    with proof of payment of cost.


                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.


                                    5. A copy of this order be sent to petitioners on given address.


                                    6. Registrar (Compliance) to take steps.


                                                                                (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    AK




Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.