Allahabad High Court
SMT. NAGINA KUERversusD.D.C. AND AOTHER
- Decided
Holding
The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Smt. Nagina Kuer filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on her behalf during the hearing. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of Rs.1000 to be deposited in the High Court Legal Services Committee account. The Registry was directed to accept any application for restoration of the petition only upon proof of payment of the cost. The interim order, if any, was vacated and a copy of the order was to be sent to the petitioner at her address.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal for want of prosecution
- cost order
- restoration of petition
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - B No. - 1714 of 1983
Smt. Nagina Kuer
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
D.D.C. And Aother
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : R.N. Singh, S.N. Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : S.C., Sankatha Rai
Court No. - 32
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Dismissed for want of prosecution with cost of Rs.1000/- to be
deposited in the Bank account of High Court Legal Services Committee.
3. Registry would accept any application for restoration, if filed, only with
proof of payment of cost.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. A copy of this order be sent to the petitioner at her given address.
(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
March 18, 2026
SB
Digitally signed by :-
SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…