Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

IRFAN KHANversusBOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHAERS

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Irfan Khan filed a writ petition (Writ‑B No. 1806 of 1982) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the Board of Revenue and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered the petitioner to pay costs of Rs. 1,000 to the High Court Legal Services Committee. The Registry was directed to accept any application for restoration only upon proof of payment of the cost. The interim order, if any, was vacated and a copy of the order was to be sent to the petitioner.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • costs
  • procedural default
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - B No. - 1806 of 1982

                                    Irfan Khan
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    Board Of Revenue And Othaers
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Rajesh Ji Verma, S.P. Lal
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : O.P. Singh, P.K. Dubey, S.C., Tej Ram

                                    Court No. - 32
                                                 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. None appeared on behalf of petitioner to press this writ petition.


                                    2. Dismissed for want of prosecution with cost of Rs. 1000/- to be

                                    deposited in the Bank account of High Court Legal Services Committee.


                                    3. Registry would accept any application for restoration, if filed, only

                                    with proof of payment of cost.


                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.


                                    5. A copy of this order be sent to petitioner on given address.


                                    6. Registrar (Compliance) to take steps.


                                                                                (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    AK




Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.