Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAJ KISHOREversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and press the petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Raj Kishore, filed Writ Petition No. 2151 of 1982 before the Allahabad High Court. The case was listed for priority hearing among the oldest pending matters. On the date of hearing, no representative of the petitioner appeared to press the petition, while the standing counsel for the State respondent was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and the lack of any steps taken to advance the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of want of prosecution. The order was pronounced by Hon'ble Justice Chandra Kumar Rai on March 19, 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear or prosecute a writ petition before the High Court?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - B No. - 2151 of 1982

                                    Raj Kishore
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    D.D.C. And Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : A.K. Singh, I.M. Pandey,              S.N.
                                                                       Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : Rama Shankar Mishra, S.C.

                                    Court No. - 55
                                                     HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.

                                    1. Cases listed under the heading of oldest pending cases for priority
                                    hearing are being revised.

                                    2. No one is present to press this petition.

                                    3. Learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent is present.

                                    4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.



                                                                                      (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    Vandana Y.




Digitally signed by :-
VANDANA YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.