Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

BANKARAIversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Bankarai filed writ petition No. 2790 of 1982 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against D.D.C. and others. The case was listed for priority hearing under the oldest pending cases. No petitioner or representative appeared to prosecute the petition, although the standing counsel for the State respondent was present. The Court noted the absence of any party to press the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may proceed in the absence of the petitioner or any representative to prosecute it

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - B No. - 2790 of 1982

                                    Bankarai
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    D.D.C. And Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : H.S.N. Tripathi, S. Nandan, Udayan
                                                                       Nandan
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : Amarendra Singh

                                    Court No. - 55
                                                     HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.

                                    1. Cases listed under heading of oldest pending cases for priority hearing
                                    are being revised.

                                    2. No one is present to press this writ petition.

                                    3. Learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent is present.

                                    4. Writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.



                                                                                        (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    Vandana Y.




Digitally signed by :-
VANDANA YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.