Allahabad High Court
RAJMANversusDY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- MANISH KUMAR NIGAM
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. A notice dated 4 January 2018 was issued to the petitioner to engage another counsel, but no appearance was made. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the petitioner
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - B No. - 4269 of 1980
Rajman
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Dy. Director Of Consolidation And Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Miss N.A.Moonis, S.C.Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Govind Saran, P.C.Singh, S.C., Vivek
Prasad Mathur
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Despite notice was issued to engage another counsel on 4.1.2018,
nobody has put in appearance.
2. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)
March 19, 2026
Rishabh
Digitally signed by :-
RISHABH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…