Allahabad High Court
VIJAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- PRAKASH PADIA
Holding
The Court ordered the Sub Divisional Magistrate to decide the pending case within two months, avoiding unnecessary adjournments.
Summary
The petitioner, Vijay, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a case (No.T202605440402551) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable lapse of time, no final decision had been rendered. The respondent State of U.P. and other respondents opposed the petition. The Court examined the record and noted the undue delay in adjudication. It directed the Sub Divisional Magistrate to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within two months, and to avoid unnecessary adjournments. The petition was disposed with the relief granted.
Issues considered
- Whether the Sub Divisional Magistrate should be directed to decide the pending case under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously.
Legislation cited
- U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 — s. 67-A
Subjects
- writ petition
- expeditious disposal
- U.P. Revenue Code
- Section 67-A
- administrative delay
- sub divisional magistrate
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 10069 of 2026
Vijay
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Munna Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing
Counsel for the respondent-State, Sri Sudhir Bharti, learned
counsel for the respondent no.5 and perused the record.
2. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition is to
direct the respondent no.3-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Kasiya,
District Kushinagar to decide the Case No.T202605440402551 filed
under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously.
3. It is argued by counsel for the petitioner that though a
considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final
decision has been taken in the matter.
4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is
disposed of directing the respondent no.3 to decide the aforesaid
case strictly in accordance with law most expeditiously and preferably
within a period of two months but without granting unnecessary
adjournment unless there is no legal impediment.
(Prakash Padia,J.)
March 18, 2026
Pramod Tripathi
Digitally signed by :-
PRAMOD TRIPATHI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…