Allahabad High Court
CHANDRA PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
Holding
The Court directed the Chairman/Principal Secretary of the State Level Caste Scrutiny Committee to decide the petitioner’s pending appeal within one month, without granting unnecessary adjournments.
Summary
Petitioner Chandra Pal Singh filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Chairman/Principal Secretary of the State Level Caste Scrutiny Committee, U.P., to decide his appeal dated 16 July 2021, filed under a 1996 Government Order, within a time‑bound period. The State, through its standing counsel, argued that the petition should not be kept pending and that a direction to consider the grievance would be appropriate. The Court, without examining the merits of the appeal, ordered the respondent to decide the pending appeal expeditiously, preferably within one month of receiving a certified copy of the order, and to avoid unnecessary adjournments. The direction aims to ensure prompt administrative action. The petition was consequently disposed with the said direction.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court can issue a mandatory direction to a government authority to decide a pending appeal within a specified time frame.
Subjects
- writ petition
- administrative law
- expeditious disposal
- State Level Caste Scrutiny Committee
- direction to government authority
- pending appeal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 10214 of 2026
Chandra Pal Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 40
HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for
the State-respondents.
2. The petitioner has come up in the present writ petition with a sole prayer
that a direction be issued to the respondent no.2-Chairman/Principal
Secretary, State Level Caste Scrutiny Committee, U.P. Government
Lucknow to decide the Appeal of the petitioner dated 16.07.2021 in
pursuance of Government Order dated 05.01.1996 pending before him
expeditiously within a time bound period.
3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served
by keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued
to respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without going
into the merits of the case, we dispose off the writ petition with a direction to
the respondent no.2-Chairman/Principal Secretary, State Level Caste
Scrutiny Committee, U.P. Government Lucknow to decide the Appeal of the
petitioner dated 16.07.2021 in pursuance of Government Order dated
05.01.1996 pending before him expeditiously, preferably within a period of
one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order without
granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties.
March 18, 2026
Sattyarth
(Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
SATTYARTH ANAND
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…