Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

APV REALTY LTD.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Apv Realty Ltd., filed Writ Petition No. 10484 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of U.P. and other respondents. The petition was found to contain discrepancies that rendered it procedurally defective. The petitioner’s counsel acknowledged the defect and requested that the petition be dismissed, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court examined the petition and concluded that it was not pressed due to the identified discrepancies. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the petition as not pressed, granting the petitioner permission to file a fresh petition if desired.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • procedural defect
  • dismissal
  • fresh petition

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                          WRIT - C No. - 10484 of 2026

                                    Apv Realty Ltd.
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Praval Tripathi, Vikash Chandra Tiwari
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 40
                                                      HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.

                                    There is certain discrepancy in the writ petition, therefore, learned counsel
                                    for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as not
                                    pressed with liberty to file afresh.

                                    Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to
                                    the petitioner to file a fresh petition.

                                    March 19, 2026
                                    NS
                                                              (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NITIN KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.