Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ASHOK KUMAR SONI @ ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court directed the Commissioner, Jhansi Region, to decide the petitioner's appeal within six weeks, thereby granting the writ of mandamus.

Summary

The petitioner, a licensed holder of a revolver, had his arms licence cancelled by the District Magistrate under Sections 3 and 4 of the U.P. Gunda Act. He filed a statutory appeal before the Commissioner, Jhansi Region, on 20 August 2024, but the appeal remained pending for an extended period. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Commissioner to decide the appeal within a reasonable time. The High Court examined the delay and the statutory right to a timely decision, and ordered the Commissioner to dispose of the appeal within six weeks of receiving a certified copy of the order. The petition was consequently disposed of with the mandated time‑frame.

Issues considered

  • Whether the delay in deciding the statutory appeal under the U.P. Gunda Act warrants issuance of a mandamus directing the Commissioner to decide the appeal within a stipulated period.

Legislation cited

  • U.P. Gunda Act — s. 3, 4

Subjects

  • mandamus
  • arms licence
  • U.P. Gunda Act
  • statutory appeal
  • administrative delay
  • high court writ

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                          WRIT - C No. - 11572 of 2026

                                    Ashok Kumar Soni @ Ashok Kumar
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)           :   Shiv Om Vikram Singh Chauhan
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)           :   C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 37
                                                        HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J.

                                    1. Heard counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel representing
                                    the State-respondents.

                                    2. The present writ petition has been preferred for issuance of a direction in
                                    the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 3- Commissioner
                                    Jhansi region Jhansi to decide the petitioner's Appeal/Case No. 907 of 2024
                                    Computerized No. C202406000000907 within stipulated time.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a valid
                                    licensee of a revolver NBP .315 bore Rifle No. 13408390 FT, holding Arms
                                    License No. 29 of 2018. It is contended that on account of the petitioner's
                                    alleged involvement in Case No. 337/323, under Section 3/4 of the U.P.
                                    Gunda Act, the District Magistrate, Lalitpur, vide order dated 08.08.2024,
                                    cancelled the aforesaid arms licence. Aggrieved by the said order, the
                                    petitioner preferred a statutory appeal before the Commissioner, Jhansi
                                    Region, Jhansi on 20.08.2024. However, despite lapse of a considerable
                                    period of time, the said appeal has not yet been decided. It is, therefore,
                                    prayed that the same be expeditiously, within a stipulated time frame.

                                    4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present writ petition is
                                    being finally disposed of with the direction to the respondent no. 3-
                                    Commissioner Jhansi region Jhansi to decide the petitioner's Appeal/Case
                                    No. 907 of 2024 within a period six weeks from the date of presentation of a
                                    certified copy of this order.

                                    April 20, 2026
                                    A. Tripathi
                                                                                             (Vinod Diwakar,J.)



Digitally signed by :-
AKHILESH TRIPATHI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.