Allahabad High Court
MRS. HARI SUMIT AARYAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
Summary
Petitioner Mrs. Hari Sumit Aarya filed a writ petition seeking permission to apply for a dealership. After filing, she discovered a brochure and other materials and decided to withdraw the petition and re‑file it afresh. The petition was not yet argued before the court. The learned judges allowed the withdrawal and ordered the petition to be dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition. No substantive merits of the dealership application were considered.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be withdrawn and the petitioner be given liberty to file a fresh petition
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- dealership
- civil procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 12965 of 2026
Mrs. Hari Sumit Aarya
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Union Of India And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kunwar Abhishek
Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Gaurav Kumar Chand, Rakesh
Kumar Gupta
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J.
HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.
1. Mr. Kunwar Abhishek, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner
and submits, his client intends to apply for dealership. Subsequent to filing
the writ petition his client discovered the brochure and other materials, for
which she be allowed to withdraw with leave to file afresh. Mr. Gaurav
Kumar Chand, learned advocate appears on behalf of respondent no. 1
(UOI). Mr. Rakesh Kumar Gupta, learned advocate appears on behalf of
respondent nos. 2 to 4 (the oil company).
2. We see from order sheet, the writ petition has not been moved. In the
circumstances, the prayer is allowed.
3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
May 6, 2026
sailesh
(Arindam Sinha,J.)
(Satya Veer Singh,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
SAILESH PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…