Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

M/S INDU TIMBER PRODUCTS PVT LTDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, with leave to institute fresh proceedings.

Summary

M/S Indu Timber Products Pvt Ltd filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority raised a preliminary objection questioning the maintainability of the petition. The petitioner’s counsel conceded that the petition was not pressed and requested its dismissal, seeking permission to file fresh proceedings. The Court accepted this submission, dismissed the writ petition as not pressed, and granted leave to institute fresh proceedings. No substantive merits of the dispute were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is maintainable before the High Court
  • Whether the petition is 'pressed' for adjudication

Subjects

  • Writ petition
  • Maintainability
  • Dismissal
  • Not pressed
  • Leave to institute fresh proceedings
  • Civil Procedure

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                           WRIT - C No. - 14605 of 2026

                                    M/S Indu Timber Products Pvt Ltd
                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Anand Kumar Singh, Aryan Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : Anuj Pratap Singh, C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 21
                                                HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
                                                HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ambrish Shukla, learned
                                    counsel for Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority
                                    (UPSIDA).

                                    2. At the outset, Sri Ambrish Shukla, learned counsel for Uttar Pradesh
                                    State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA) has raised a
                                    preliminary objection to the maintainability of the instant proceedings at
                                    the instance of the petitioner.

                                    3. Confronted with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly
                                    submits that the instant writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed and
                                    leave may be accorded to institute fresh proceedings.

                                    4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed
                                    with the aforesaid leave.


                                                      (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    Priya




Digitally signed by :-
PRIYA KUSHWAHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.