Allahabad High Court
SMT. BABITA AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. & 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Summary
The petitioners, Smt. Babita Agarwal, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioners argued that the petition should be dismissed as not pressed, granting them liberty to file a fresh petition. The State of U.P. and other respondents did not oppose this submission. The Court, after hearing the submissions, dismissed the writ petition on the ground that it was not pressed, while allowing the petitioners to file a fresh petition if they wish. No substantive legal questions were adjudicated, and the order was pronounced on 5 May 2026.
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- not pressed
- fresh petition
- Allahabad High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 15160 of 2026
Smt. Babita Agarwal
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. & 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aqueel Ahmad, Kripa Shankar Tiwari,
Vaibhav Tyagi, Vinit Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ambrish Shukla, C.S.C.
Court No. - 21
HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
1. Shri Aqueel Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the
instant writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a
fresh petition.
2. Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel
appearing for the State-respondents, has no objection to the same.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the
aforesaid liberty.
May 5, 2026
Mukesh Kr.
(Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
MUKESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…