Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RIBHU DUBEYversusGAUTAM BUDDHA UNIVERSITY AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court held that the writ petition is to be disposed of, granting liberty to pursue the internal appeal and directing the university to decide it expeditiously.

Summary

The petitioner, Ribhu Dubey, was expelled from Gautam Buddha University and filed a writ petition challenging the expulsion. The petitioner’s counsel argued that an alternative remedy exists in the form of an appeal before the university's Board of Management. The university’s counsel raised no objection to this approach. The court accepted that the alternative remedy is available and therefore disposed of the writ petition, granting the petitioner liberty to file the internal appeal within a week. The court further directed the university to decide the appeal within two weeks, adopting a sympathetic view.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition challenging a university expulsion is maintainable when an alternative internal appeal mechanism is available
  • Whether the court can direct the university to decide the internal appeal within a specified time frame

Subjects

  • expulsion
  • university
  • writ petition
  • alternative remedy
  • administrative law
  • speedy disposal

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 15201 of 2026

                                    Ribhu Dubey
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    Gautam Buddha University And 3 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                     :   Gautam Dubey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                     :   Jai Bahadur Singh

                                    Court No. - 32
                                                  HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. Heard Sri Gautam Dubey, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Jai

                                    Bahadur Singh, Advocate for Respondent-University.


                                    2. This case is arising out of expultion of petitioner from Respondent-

                                    University.

                                    3. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner, fairly submits that petitioner

                                    has an alternative remedy to file an appeal before Board of Management,

                                    therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of with aforesaid liberty and

                                    with further direction to concerned respondent to decide appeal within a

                                    short period.


                                    4. Learned counsel appearing for Respondent-University has not

                                    objection to aforesaid request.


                                    5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with aforesaid liberty. It is

                                    further observed that in case appeal is filed by petitioner within a week,

                                    the concerned respondent will decide the same within two weeks

                                    thereafter taking a sympathetic view.
                                    April 22, 2026
                                    AK

                                                                                (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.