TULSI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

                                                     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                               WRIT - C No. - 16700 of 2026

                                    Tulsi Devi
                                                                                                      .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                           Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                    .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                         :    Manvendra Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                         :    C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 21
                                                      HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
                                                      HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.

                                         1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ambrish Shukla,
                                            learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
                                         2. In view of the order, which is proposed to be passed, notice need not to
                                            issued to the private respondent no. 3.
                                         3. In pith and substance, the grievance of the petitioner is that the
                                            claim/representation dated 12.01.2026 pending before the second
                                            respondent be decided within stipulated period.
                                         4. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel very fairly states that in
                                            case any such representation is still pending and has not been disposed
                                            of, the same will be considered and decided expeditiously.
                                         5. In view of the above, on consent and without expressing any opinion
                                            on the merits of the issue and considering the facts and circumstances
                                            of the case, this writ petition is disposed of finally asking the petitioner
                                            to move a fresh application/representation before the second
                                            respondent ventilating her grievance qua to her rights within two weeks
                                            from today. In case, any such application/representation is preferred by
                                            the petitioner within stipulated period definitely the same would be
                                            looked into, examined and remedied strictly in accordance with law
                                            within six weeks thereafter but certainly after affording opportunity to
                                            all stakeholders specially respondent no. 3.



                                                           (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    A.K.Srivastava




Digitally signed by :-
ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad