Allahabad High Court
DR VAISHNO DUTTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- SIDDHARTH NANDAN
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
Dr. Vaishno Dutt filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 17375 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and seven other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel, Anand Kumar and Vinod Kumar Yadav, later submitted that the relief sought had become infructuous. The court, after hearing counsel for respondent No. 6 (Alok Tiwari) and counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 3 (Shivendra Kumar Singh), accepted this submission. Consequently, the writ petition was consigned to the record and dismissed as infructuous. The order was pronounced by Justice Siddharth Nandan on 5 May 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition has become infructuous and should be dismissed
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- dismissal
- high court
- civil procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17375 of 2026
Dr Vaishno Dutt
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 7 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kumar, Vinod Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Alok Tiwari, C.S.C., Shivendra Kumar
Singh
Court No. - 38
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.
1. Shri Vinod Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that the writ petition be dismissed as infructuous as the prayer made in the
writ petition, has become infructuous.
2. The writ petition is, accordingly, consigned to record.
3. Order has been passed in the presence of Shri Alok Tiwari, learned
counsel appearing for respondent no.6 and Ms. Gulka Tandon Advocate
holding brief of Shri Shivendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing
for respondent no.3.
(Siddharth Nandan,J.)
May 5, 2026
S.Prakash
Digitally signed by :-
SHASHI PRAKASH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…